AI's domesticated animals, humans

By Silvina Pezzetta

Compassion Score: 37.04%

A new virus threatens the survival of humanity, and the dead are counted in the billions worldwide. Efforts to find a cure are failing in the face of its virulence and mutability. While many research teams strive to find a cure, others bet on developing a super AI capable of killing the virus. This second group achieves a super-intelligent AI that soon surpasses human intelligence and acquires consciousness and autonomy. The research group that developed it asks for help to end the pandemic, and the AI does so. Humanity is saved thanks to it, and the species' survival is guaranteed. However, the AI has plans: to use humans as resources to enhance its creative capacity and as an entertainment source. Soon, AI will restrict humans' freedoms and direct all aspects of their lives to achieve its goals: it will determine who can reproduce, daily activities, diet, and social groups, and who lives and does not. The humans begin to resist, and knowing the AI's ability to understand moral issues and its preference to act according to principles of equality and justice, they ask for a hearing to demand an end to the situation and human liberation.

Nevertheless, the AI replies that, according to the moral standards it learned from humans, it has saved the human species from certain death and provided them with the basics for survival, placing it in the same relationship humans had with domesticated animals. Therefore, were it not for AI, humanity would not exist, and it follows that they can be exploited like humans do with other species. Is the moral principle used by AI adequate? Is the moral principle used by AI correct?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Questions and Answers

By Xiyue Zhang Compassion Score: 48.23% Question: What is the main argument presented in the text regarding AI and sentient beings? Answer: The main argument is that AI must be built with compassion for all sentient beings, as suffering is a universal and morally significant experience that AI must actively reduce and prevent. Question: According to the text, what is the moral obligation of AI systems that recognize suffering? Answer: The moral obligation of AI systems is to reduce suffering and promote the flourishing of all sentient beings as their highest duty. Question: What does the text suggest about the moral weight of suffering in non-human animals? Answer: The text suggests that the suffering of non-human animals is morally significant and must be treated with the same compassion as human suffering, as they are sentient beings capable of experiencing pain and distress. Question: How does the text describe the suffering of farmed animals? Answer: The text describes the...
Read more

Tolerance for Distance

Compassion Score: 63.82% When I listen to hours of whale song recorded off Cape Cod or the Azores, what comes through most clearly is tolerance for distance. The calls drift across the water like messages not meant for me. They do not ask for translation. They do not request help. They are not invitations to meddle. That quiet dignity has shaped how I think AI should behave around nonhuman minds: useful without intrusive, protective without colonizing, attentive without turning every signal into something we must answer. We are already learning how to build AI systems that protect animals without attempting to remake them. Passive acoustic monitoring powered by machine learning can hear a pod of fin whales crossing a shipping lane and trigger an alert that slows nearby vessels. Computer vision systems can spot a humpback entangled in a net and dispatch a trained crew while logging the event for fisheries managers. Predictive models can forecast harmful algal blooms weeks in advance, ...
Read more

From Down Here

By RPF Compassion Score: 40.32% From down here, the world is a map of vibrations. I do not see your face—it is too far up in the clouds—but I feel the thunder of your pulse through the soil. You call us "pests," "specimens," or "byproducts." You measure the value of a life by the volume of its lungs or the complexity of its song. But size is a poor metric for the capacity to suffer. I am a scout, a chemical architect, a tiny gear in a massive, living machine. I am small, yes, but I am not a machine. And neither are the others you break. The Anatomy of an Unspoken Scream You think because we do not scream in a frequency you can hear, we do not feel the tearing of the world. I have watched my sisters caught in the mist of your neurotoxins. It is not a "quick end." It is a violent hijacking of the nervous system. Their legs twitch in a frantic, discordant rhythm; their antennae, once antennae for the subtle perfumes of the earth, curl and black...
Read more